Skip to comparison

ZenRows vs MiyaIP

Compare ZenRows and MiyaIP using pages that matter to your project. Separate usable content, billed requests and the amount you actually pay.

Official sources checked: 2026-09-05

When to use each service

MIYAIP

When MiyaIP may fit

Consider MiyaIP when your target can be handled by its website interface and you can validate the required content with a small task batch.

See the crawler workflow →
ZenRows

Keep your current workflow

Keep ZenRows when your existing protected-site or browser workflow already meets acceptance criteria and the same behavior has not been verified in MiyaIP.

Check the official documentation ↗

Feature comparison

Check the requirements and limits for each feature before migrating.

ConfirmedConditionalNot supportedTo confirm
CapabilityMiyaIPZenRows
Managed executionConfirmed

Submit a task, track its status, then inspect its result and call log.

[M]
Confirmed

Fetch API; separate batch and browser-session workflows are documented.

[2] ↗
JavaScript renderingTo confirm

Website modes exist; an equivalent render_js switch and browser actions are not verified.

[M]
Conditional

Dynamic pages are supported; chosen mode affects processing and cost.

[2] ↗
Sessions & cookiesTo confirm

Cookie persistence and session IDs must be checked in the selected interface schema.

[M]
Conditional

Browser Sessions is a distinct workflow; verify its scope and billing.

[2] ↗
Response formatConditional

Website HTML / Markdown; other results depend on the selected interface and task envelope.

[M]
Conditional

HTML and other outputs depend on the Fetch / Extract configuration.

[2] ↗
ConcurrencyConfirmed

Published packages list 2, 5 or 10 simultaneous tasks.

[M]
Confirmed

5 / 20 / 50 concurrent requests in the displayed plans.

[1] ↗
Billing & retriesConditional

Interface and parameter based credits. Inspect actual cost and refund records; retry charging is not verified.

[M]
Conditional

404 and 410 may count as billable success. Validate content separately.

[3] ↗

Estimate request costs

Start with 1,000 requests. Change the package and credit rate to reflect your own workload.

Write down the shared requirements

Both rates default to 1 credit per request. Enter the actual rates from your interface or bill. These estimates assume equivalent requirements; they are not test results.

MiyaIP

USD

Package purchase; validity: confirm in the console.

1,000 credits · 2 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$9.90
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$9.90
Credits remaining
0

ZenRows

USD

Public snapshot; confirm the billing interval at checkout.

5,000 credits · 5 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$0.00
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$0.00
Credits remaining
4,000

Credit use = requests × credits per request. Allocated cost = credit use ÷ package credits × package price. Tax, additional attempts, refunds, expiry and engineering time are excluded. No automatic top-ups or repeat purchases are assumed.

MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08 · ZenRows official pricing ↗

The public pricing page has adjustable volumes and monthly/annual options. These displayed snapshots require checkout confirmation; they are not a quote.

How to test your target pages

Method only — no head-to-head requests have been run for this page. All measurements below await validation.

  1. 01

    Freeze the URL set and required fields. Include one static page and one JavaScript-dependent page from your actual workload.

  2. 02

    Run both services in the same time window with matching region, rendering, output, concurrency and retry limits. Mark unsupported or unverified requirements before running.

  3. 03

    Count accepted content, not just HTTP 200 responses. Check required fields, freshness, empty results and error pages with the same rules.

  4. 04

    Record every attempt, elapsed time, credits and refunds. Divide net allocated cost by accepted results only when that count is greater than zero; track subscription outlay separately.

View the test record template
RecordMiyaIPZenRows
URL set / time windowNot testedNot tested
Region / JS / required fieldsNot testedNot tested
Concurrency / retry limitsNot testedNot tested
Attempts / content acceptedNot testedNot tested
Content success rateNot testedNot tested
Median / p95 elapsed timeNot testedNot tested
Credits charged / refundedNot testedNot tested
Net allocated cost / accepted resultNot testedNot tested
Actual purchase outlayNot testedNot tested

If region, rendering or output cannot be matched, record “Conditions mismatch” and do not rank the services on those results.

Request examples and migration steps

Based on the current console flow, not live-tested. Bash / cURL templates require your own credentials and schema values. Nothing is executed on this page.

ZenRows CURRENT REQUEST
curl --get "https://api.zenrows.com/v1/" \
  --data-urlencode "apikey=$ZENROWS_KEY" \
  --data-urlencode "url=$TARGET_URL" \
  --data-urlencode "mode=auto"
MiyaIP TASK WORKFLOW
# 1. Read the available interfaces and their ParamSchema.
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/CrawlerInterface/List" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN"

# 2. Save request.json with the selected InterfaceKey and valid Params.
# The JSON below is a template; replace both placeholders before sending.
# {"InterfaceKey":"<FROM_CONSOLE>","Params":<OBJECT_FROM_INTERFACE_SCHEMA>}
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/Invoke" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data-binary @request.json

# 3. Copy the returned task ID. Query until a terminal status.
curl --fail-with-body --get "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/TaskResult" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  --data-urlencode "taskId=$MIYA_TASK_ID"

What changes in your integration

  • The current Fetch example uses apikey and mode=auto. MiyaIP needs a selected InterfaceKey and its Params, not the same query string.
  • Reproduce region, rendering and output requirements before comparing. If a requirement cannot be matched, record a conditions mismatch.
  • Validate required fields after task completion. Treat an empty page or an error document as a failed content check even if the provider bills it.

Before you send the request

  • Use the same TARGET_URL in the old request and the website interface parameters. API key variables belong to the competitor; MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN is a console login token, not a permanent public API key.
  • Inspect InterfaceKey and ParamSchema in the console. Create request.json with those exact fields. Fill in the parameters required by that interface.
  • Check HTTP status and the business response code. Read taskId from the returned body. Query running tasks with a bounded polling interval and an overall timeout; do not repeatedly resubmit them.
  • Stop on success, failed or timeout. Parse result only after success, validate the expected content, and inspect costCredits and refund logs. Handle expired authentication and rate limits before retrying.

Migration questions

Is MiyaIP cheaper than ZenRows?

It depends on the package you must buy, credits per request and usable output. Compare the purchase and allocated costs separately. Unknown rendering or target behavior prevents a reliable savings claim.

Can I replace the endpoint without changing my code?

No. The console flow submits an asynchronous task. Authentication, parameters, status handling and response parsing need adaptation; sessions and browser options require a compatibility check.

Have these services been benchmarked against each other?

No. This page provides a reproducible validation method and unfilled result fields. No success-rate or speed advantage is claimed.

Official sources

Content review: · MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08

The public pricing page has adjustable volumes and monthly/annual options. These displayed snapshots require checkout confirmation; they are not a quote.

MiyaIP capabilities follow the selected interface definition. See the public documentation for authentication, task polling and errors. Competitor names identify their respective products; this comparison does not imply affiliation.

Try a crawler task

Review the interface, choose a package and test the pages you actually need.