Skip to comparison

ScraperAPI vs MiyaIP

Compare ScraperAPI with MiyaIP for a small scraping project: check the cash outlay, map the request, and verify the response your parser needs.

Official sources checked: 2026-09-05

When to use each service

MIYAIP

When MiyaIP may fit

Consider MiyaIP when a small package and a task-based workflow fit your project. Confirm that its website interface returns the content you need before moving the job.

See the crawler workflow →
ScraperAPI

Keep your current workflow

Keep ScraperAPI when existing domain parsers, rendering settings or higher concurrency are essential. A smaller purchase does not automatically mean a lower cost per usable page.

Check the official documentation ↗

Feature comparison

Check the requirements and limits for each feature before migrating.

ConfirmedConditionalNot supportedTo confirm
CapabilityMiyaIPScraperAPI
Managed executionConfirmed

Submit a task, track its status, then inspect its result and call log.

[M]
Confirmed

HTTP API with managed proxy handling; asynchronous service is also available.

[2] ↗
JavaScript renderingTo confirm

Website modes exist; an equivalent render_js switch and browser actions are not verified.

[M]
Conditional

Rendering is available; target and options affect credit use.

[2] ↗
Sessions & cookiesTo confirm

Cookie persistence and session IDs must be checked in the selected interface schema.

[M]
Conditional

Custom session support; verify the exact behavior needed by your job.

[2] ↗
Response formatConditional

Website HTML / Markdown; other results depend on the selected interface and task envelope.

[M]
Conditional

Page content through the endpoint; structured parsing depends on the target and API.

[2] ↗
ConcurrencyConfirmed

Published packages list 2, 5 or 10 simultaneous tasks.

[M]
Confirmed

20 / 50 / 100 concurrent threads in the three plans shown here.

[1] ↗
Billing & retriesConditional

Interface and parameter based credits. Inspect actual cost and refund records; retry charging is not verified.

[M]
Conditional

Credits vary by request settings. Check the domain cost before comparing.

[3] ↗

Estimate request costs

Start with 1,000 requests. Change the package and credit rate to reflect your own workload.

Write down the shared requirements

Both rates default to 1 credit per request. Enter the actual rates from your interface or bill. These estimates assume equivalent requirements; they are not test results.

MiyaIP

USD

Package purchase; validity: confirm in the console.

1,000 credits · 2 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$9.90
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$9.90
Credits remaining
0

ScraperAPI

USD

Monthly subscription snapshot.

100,000 credits · 20 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$49.00
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$0.49
Credits remaining
99,000

Credit use = requests × credits per request. Allocated cost = credit use ÷ package credits × package price. Tax, additional attempts, refunds, expiry and engineering time are excluded. No automatic top-ups or repeat purchases are assumed.

MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08 · ScraperAPI official pricing ↗

How to test your target pages

Method only — no head-to-head requests have been run for this page. All measurements below await validation.

  1. 01

    Freeze the URL set and required fields. Include one static page and one JavaScript-dependent page from your actual workload.

  2. 02

    Run both services in the same time window with matching region, rendering, output, concurrency and retry limits. Mark unsupported or unverified requirements before running.

  3. 03

    Count accepted content, not just HTTP 200 responses. Check required fields, freshness, empty results and error pages with the same rules.

  4. 04

    Record every attempt, elapsed time, credits and refunds. Divide net allocated cost by accepted results only when that count is greater than zero; track subscription outlay separately.

View the test record template
RecordMiyaIPScraperAPI
URL set / time windowNot testedNot tested
Region / JS / required fieldsNot testedNot tested
Concurrency / retry limitsNot testedNot tested
Attempts / content acceptedNot testedNot tested
Content success rateNot testedNot tested
Median / p95 elapsed timeNot testedNot tested
Credits charged / refundedNot testedNot tested
Net allocated cost / accepted resultNot testedNot tested
Actual purchase outlayNot testedNot tested

If region, rendering or output cannot be matched, record “Conditions mismatch” and do not rank the services on those results.

Request examples and migration steps

Based on the current console flow, not live-tested. Bash / cURL templates require your own credentials and schema values. Nothing is executed on this page.

ScraperAPI CURRENT REQUEST
curl --get "https://api.scraperapi.com/" \
  --data-urlencode "api_key=$SCRAPERAPI_KEY" \
  --data-urlencode "url=$TARGET_URL"
MiyaIP TASK WORKFLOW
# 1. Read the available interfaces and their ParamSchema.
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/CrawlerInterface/List" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN"

# 2. Save request.json with the selected InterfaceKey and valid Params.
# The JSON below is a template; replace both placeholders before sending.
# {"InterfaceKey":"<FROM_CONSOLE>","Params":<OBJECT_FROM_INTERFACE_SCHEMA>}
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/Invoke" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data-binary @request.json

# 3. Copy the returned task ID. Query until a terminal status.
curl --fail-with-body --get "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/TaskResult" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  --data-urlencode "taskId=$MIYA_TASK_ID"

What changes in your integration

  • Replace query-string authentication with the MiyaIP console authentication flow. The tokens are not interchangeable.
  • Move URL and supported options into the selected interface Params. Do not copy render, premium or session options without a matching schema field.
  • A submitted task is not the scraped page. Wait for success, read the result envelope and adapt your HTML or structured-data parser.

Before you send the request

  • Use the same TARGET_URL in the old request and the website interface parameters. API key variables belong to the competitor; MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN is a console login token, not a permanent public API key.
  • Inspect InterfaceKey and ParamSchema in the console. Create request.json with those exact fields. Fill in the parameters required by that interface.
  • Check HTTP status and the business response code. Read taskId from the returned body. Query running tasks with a bounded polling interval and an overall timeout; do not repeatedly resubmit them.
  • Stop on success, failed or timeout. Parse result only after success, validate the expected content, and inspect costCredits and refund logs. Handle expired authentication and rate limits before retrying.

Migration questions

Is MiyaIP cheaper than ScraperAPI?

It depends on the package you must buy, credits per request and usable output. Compare the purchase and allocated costs separately. Unknown rendering or target behavior prevents a reliable savings claim.

Can I replace the endpoint without changing my code?

No. The console flow submits an asynchronous task. Authentication, parameters, status handling and response parsing need adaptation; sessions and browser options require a compatibility check.

Have these services been benchmarked against each other?

No. This page provides a reproducible validation method and unfilled result fields. No success-rate or speed advantage is claimed.

Official sources

Content review: · MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08

MiyaIP capabilities follow the selected interface definition. See the public documentation for authentication, task polling and errors. Competitor names identify their respective products; this comparison does not imply affiliation.

Try a crawler task

Review the interface, choose a package and test the pages you actually need.