Skip to comparison

ScrapingBee vs MiyaIP

Evaluate a ScrapingBee alternative with the same JavaScript requirements, credit assumptions and concurrency limits—not just a headline price.

Official sources checked: 2026-09-05

When to use each service

MIYAIP

When MiyaIP may fit

Consider MiyaIP for task-based website collection when its available interface covers your output requirements and its package concurrency is sufficient.

See the crawler workflow →
ScrapingBee

Keep your current workflow

Keep ScrapingBee for workflows that already depend on JavaScript scenarios, screenshots or extraction rules until equivalent behavior is verified in MiyaIP.

Check the official documentation ↗

Feature comparison

Check the requirements and limits for each feature before migrating.

ConfirmedConditionalNot supportedTo confirm
CapabilityMiyaIPScrapingBee
Managed executionConfirmed

Submit a task, track its status, then inspect its result and call log.

[M]
Confirmed

Managed browsers and proxy rotation behind an HTTP API.

[2] ↗
JavaScript renderingTo confirm

Website modes exist; an equivalent render_js switch and browser actions are not verified.

[M]
Conditional

render_js and js_scenario options; verify their cost and waiting behavior.

[2] ↗
Sessions & cookiesTo confirm

Cookie persistence and session IDs must be checked in the selected interface schema.

[M]
Conditional

Cookie inputs are documented; do not assume automatic session parity.

[2] ↗
Response formatConditional

Website HTML / Markdown; other results depend on the selected interface and task envelope.

[M]
Conditional

HTML by default; JSON wrapping and extraction options are available.

[2] ↗
ConcurrencyConfirmed

Published packages list 2, 5 or 10 simultaneous tasks.

[M]
Confirmed

25 / 50 / 100 concurrent requests in the plans shown.

[1] ↗
Billing & retriesConditional

Interface and parameter based credits. Inspect actual cost and refund records; retry charging is not verified.

[M]
Conditional

Rendering and proxy choices affect credits; enter the cost for your configuration.

[3] ↗

Estimate request costs

Start with 1,000 requests. Change the package and credit rate to reflect your own workload.

Write down the shared requirements

Both rates default to 1 credit per request. Enter the actual rates from your interface or bill. These estimates assume equivalent requirements; they are not test results.

MiyaIP

USD

Package purchase; validity: confirm in the console.

1,000 credits · 2 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$9.90
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$9.90
Credits remaining
0

ScrapingBee

USD

Monthly subscription snapshot.

75,000 credits · 25 concurrent tasks / requests

Package purchase
$19.00
Estimated credit use
1,000
Allocated credit cost
$0.2533
Credits remaining
74,000

Credit use = requests × credits per request. Allocated cost = credit use ÷ package credits × package price. Tax, additional attempts, refunds, expiry and engineering time are excluded. No automatic top-ups or repeat purchases are assumed.

MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08 · ScrapingBee official pricing ↗

How to test your target pages

Method only — no head-to-head requests have been run for this page. All measurements below await validation.

  1. 01

    Freeze the URL set and required fields. Include one static page and one JavaScript-dependent page from your actual workload.

  2. 02

    Run both services in the same time window with matching region, rendering, output, concurrency and retry limits. Mark unsupported or unverified requirements before running.

  3. 03

    Count accepted content, not just HTTP 200 responses. Check required fields, freshness, empty results and error pages with the same rules.

  4. 04

    Record every attempt, elapsed time, credits and refunds. Divide net allocated cost by accepted results only when that count is greater than zero; track subscription outlay separately.

View the test record template
RecordMiyaIPScrapingBee
URL set / time windowNot testedNot tested
Region / JS / required fieldsNot testedNot tested
Concurrency / retry limitsNot testedNot tested
Attempts / content acceptedNot testedNot tested
Content success rateNot testedNot tested
Median / p95 elapsed timeNot testedNot tested
Credits charged / refundedNot testedNot tested
Net allocated cost / accepted resultNot testedNot tested
Actual purchase outlayNot testedNot tested

If region, rendering or output cannot be matched, record “Conditions mismatch” and do not rank the services on those results.

Request examples and migration steps

Based on the current console flow, not live-tested. Bash / cURL templates require your own credentials and schema values. Nothing is executed on this page.

ScrapingBee CURRENT REQUEST
curl --get "https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/" \
  --data-urlencode "api_key=$SCRAPINGBEE_KEY" \
  --data-urlencode "url=$TARGET_URL" \
  --data-urlencode "render_js=true"
MiyaIP TASK WORKFLOW
# 1. Read the available interfaces and their ParamSchema.
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/CrawlerInterface/List" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN"

# 2. Save request.json with the selected InterfaceKey and valid Params.
# The JSON below is a template; replace both placeholders before sending.
# {"InterfaceKey":"<FROM_CONSOLE>","Params":<OBJECT_FROM_INTERFACE_SCHEMA>}
curl --fail-with-body "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/Invoke" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data-binary @request.json

# 3. Copy the returned task ID. Query until a terminal status.
curl --fail-with-body --get "https://miyaip.com/api/Crawler/TaskResult" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN" \
  --data-urlencode "taskId=$MIYA_TASK_ID"

What changes in your integration

  • Keep the target URL, but translate only parameters declared by the MiyaIP interface. render_js and js_scenario have no verified one-to-one mapping.
  • Recheck wait conditions, cookies and extracted fields with the same page. Receiving HTML does not prove that JavaScript completed.
  • Replace a synchronous response with task polling and adjust worker concurrency to the purchased MiyaIP package.

Before you send the request

  • Use the same TARGET_URL in the old request and the website interface parameters. API key variables belong to the competitor; MIYA_CONSOLE_TOKEN is a console login token, not a permanent public API key.
  • Inspect InterfaceKey and ParamSchema in the console. Create request.json with those exact fields. Fill in the parameters required by that interface.
  • Check HTTP status and the business response code. Read taskId from the returned body. Query running tasks with a bounded polling interval and an overall timeout; do not repeatedly resubmit them.
  • Stop on success, failed or timeout. Parse result only after success, validate the expected content, and inspect costCredits and refund logs. Handle expired authentication and rate limits before retrying.

Migration questions

Is MiyaIP cheaper than ScrapingBee?

It depends on the package you must buy, credits per request and usable output. Compare the purchase and allocated costs separately. Unknown rendering or target behavior prevents a reliable savings claim.

Can I replace the endpoint without changing my code?

No. The console flow submits an asynchronous task. Authentication, parameters, status handling and response parsing need adaptation; sessions and browser options require a compatibility check.

Have these services been benchmarked against each other?

No. This page provides a reproducible validation method and unfilled result fields. No success-rate or speed advantage is claimed.

Official sources

Content review: · MiyaIP package snapshot: 2026-08-08

MiyaIP capabilities follow the selected interface definition. See the public documentation for authentication, task polling and errors. Competitor names identify their respective products; this comparison does not imply affiliation.

Try a crawler task

Review the interface, choose a package and test the pages you actually need.